Legal Opinion
United States v. Antonio Ruben Inigo, United States of America v. Raul Armando Giordano, United States of America v. Bruno Skerianz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 1, 1991No. 90-3142, 90-3151 and 90-3152PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
In these three consolidated appeals, Antonio Inigo (Inigo), Raul Giordano (Giorda-no) and Bruno Skerianz (Skerianz) seek to overturn their Hobbs Act convictions for attempting and conspiring to extort $10,-000,000.00 from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc. (DuPont), in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951 (West 1984). After a jury found them all guilty of both charges, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware sentenced Skerianz to two concurrent seventy-eight-month terms of imprisonment and three years of supervised release,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Yul Darnell Givan, United States of America v. Wayne TorrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ColladoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.