Legal Opinion

Gordon v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 5, 1958No. 461-55PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on the report of Mastín G. White, a trial commissioner of our court, on exceptions to his report, and to his recommendation for the conclusion of law to be entered. The commissioner wrote an opinion expressing the opinion that neither Mrs. Alexander Gordon nor the trust was engaged in the real estate business in 1950 and 1951. He was of the opinion that the lots sold in those years did not constitute “property held by * * * [plaintiffs] primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of * * * [their] trade or business.” They were sales made by plaintiffs in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. MAULDIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Arthur W. Smith and Mrs. Arthur W. Smith v. Charles H. Dunn, Formerly Acting Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Fahs v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. Dunlap, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue v. Oldham Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Recordak Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. John Nadalin and Mary Nadalin v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Boeing v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Cebrian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Oahu Sugar Company, Limited v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API