Legal Opinion

Oahu Sugar Company, Limited v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1962No. 422-58PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this action, plaintiff, Oahu Sugar Company, Limited, sues for refund of additional income taxes in the amount of $341,968.75, with interest, assessed and paid for the years 1950, 1951 and 1952.

Since 1897, plaintiff has operated a sugar plantation, including a raw sugar mill, on the Island of Oahu in Hawaii.

The controversy is whether gains from plaintiff’s sales of certain unimproved land and land with houses thereon should be taxed as capital gains or as ordinary income. 1 Plaintiff asserts the former; the defendant, of course, asserts the latter.

Condemnation by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. Garrett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Palos Verdes Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Lazarus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Boeing v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Recordak Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. John Nadalin and Mary Nadalin v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Armco Steel Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1966
  5. Bert Crosswhite and Virginia Crosswhite v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API