Legal Opinion

Billy Dwight Coney v. Mr. And Mrs. Ainsworth Smith, Det. Douglas Mundy

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 13, 1984No. 83-5407PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal presents two issues that merit the consideration of this Court. In the first, Coney alleges in his § 1983 complaint that, although he pleaded guilty and was convicted on the basis of such plea and did not appeal therefrom, he alleges that his conviction was illegal because it was based on an illegal arrest and illegal search of his car. The trial court determined that the plea of guilty entered by Coney stood as a bar under the doctrine of collateral estoppel to the § 1983 action. It is not quite so simple. In Haring v. Procise, 462 U.S. 306, 103 S.Ct. 2368, 76 L.Ed.2d 595 (1983),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Moore v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. William HopeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. K.T. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Wetherbee v. Willow Lane, Inc. (In Re Bestway Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API