In re Lundgren
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed formal charges against Respondent alleging he committed misconduct by violating the rules governing pro hac vice admission and serving improper subpoena and discovery requests. Respondent is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina.1 Because Respondent failed to file any response to the formal charges, all the allegations contained therein are deemed admitted. Rule 24(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Neither ODC nor Respondent filed exceptions to the recommendation and the matter is now before the Court for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re JacobsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- In re Van SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013