Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Reliance Insurance Companies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1984No. 01472PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal by appellant, Maynard J. Patterson, from a summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. The issue on appeal is whether the personal injury endorsement to Williamsport’s general liability policy provided for an obligation to defend additional insureds in criminal actions or to reimburse those insureds for the costs of such a defense. We hold that it did not and thus affirm the summary judgment.

Appellant was the Chief of Police of Williamsport, Pennsylvania from 1974 to 1975. In 1974 appellant-was charged in a nine count criminal complaint. A jury found him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Celley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Timbrook v. Foremost InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. 26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 663, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,447 in Re Allegheny International, Inc. J. Daniel SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. In re Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API