Legal Opinion

Crandall v. Grbic

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 14, 2006No. 94,846PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Plaintiffs John and Constance Crandall appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment to defendant Mike Grbic. Plaintiffs sued defendant under theories of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentation, and violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. We affirm.

Underlying Facts

In June 2003, the plaintiffs, who were California residents, went to Wichita, Kansas, and looked at houses for sale as they were anticipating relocating to Wichita to be closer to family. At the time, plaintiff Constance Crandall held a license to sell real estate in California.

*181Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Mahler v. Keenan Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Mitchell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Alires v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. Griffin v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dana v. Heartland Management Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  2. Ayalla v. Southridge Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. Schneider v. Liberty Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  5. Santana v. OlguinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API