Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Liberty Asset Management
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 27, 2011No. 104,361PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Marquardt, J.:
Liberty Asset Management (Liberty) appeals from the trial court’s finding that it violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., by engaging in a deceptive act. We reverse.
Liberty’s business includes purchasing residential property redemption rights. In December 2006, Liberty purchased the redemption rights to property at 222 South Greenwood, Wichita. After rehabbing the house, Daniel Drake, a managing member of Liberty, hired Darren W. Boldea, a real estate broker with Allegiant GMAC, to market the property. Boldea prepared a multiple listing service…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Haag v. Dry Basement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Conner v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hernandez v. PistotnikCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Garver v. Principal Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Harris v. City Cycle Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Hills v. ArensdorfDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Hills v. Arensdorf Case Consolidated for Pretrial and Discover Purposes only All Non-Dispositive filings to be made in Lead Case 20-cv-4037District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.