Legal Opinion

Murray City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1920No. 3447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by Murray City against the Utah Light & Traction Company and the Utah Power & Light Company. From judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

The defendants separately demurred to the complaint on the ground that the same does not state a cause of action. The demurrers were sustained. Leave was given to amend. Plaintiff elected to stand upon its complaint. Accordingly a judgment of dismissal was entered. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

As indicated by the complaint, the'object which plaintiff seeks is the enforcement by the court of an ordinance revoking or forfeiting the right of the defendants to operate a street or interurban railway over the main street of plaintiff city, designated in the complaint as State…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Camp Mfg. Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Logan City v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United States Smelting, Refining & M. Co. v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Utah Copper Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Union Pac. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Utah Hotel Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API