Legal Opinion

Utah Copper Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921No. 3659PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari by the Utah Copper Company to review an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Utah in the matter of the application of the Utah Power & Light Company for permission to increase its power rates under the Public Utilities Act.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

This case is brought here by the plaintiff on a writ of cer-tiorari to review an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Utah made and entered on the 8th day of March, 1921, in the matter of the application of the defendant Utah Power & Light Company for permission to increase its power rates, under the provisions of title 91, Comp. Laws Utah 1917, commonly known and referred to as the Public Utilities Act.

*194For convenience, hereinafter the plaintiff will be referred to as the “Copper Company,” and the defendants, respéctively, as the “Commission”'and the “Power Company,” while the statute…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc & Northern Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McGrew v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Logan City v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API