Legal Opinion

Red Rose Motors Inc. v. Boyer & Ritter

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided February 23, 2004No. CI-1996-1108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGELIS, P.J.,

Before me is the motion for summary judgment of the defendant, Boyer & Ritter. This action is based on negligence and breach of contract. The plaintiffs, Red Rose Motors Inc. and Robert Wesoloskie, seek damages from Boyer & Ritter for its alleged failure, through its accounting work, to identify a third party’s embezzlement of funds from Red Rose Motors Inc. Boyer & Ritter seeks summary judgment on four grounds. It contends that the plaintiffs are barred from recovery on their negligence and breach of contract counts. The motion will be granted.

Wesoloskie was president and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Landell v. LybrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, PCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API