Eno v. . Klein
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division reversing on the law and the facts the judgment of the trial court and dismissing the complaint is modified by granting a new trial. No motion having been made at the close of the case by the defendant for a dismissal of the complaint or for a direction of a verdict, it constituted in this case a concession or admission upon his part that there was evidence which justified a submission of the case to the jury.
The Appellate Division, therefore, had no power to dismiss the complaint. (Civil Practice Act, sec. 584; Murtha v. Ridley, 232 N. Y. 488.)
Section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murtha v. . RidleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Colella v. Smith-Fredenburg Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Luechinger v. . EichhammerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Sanchez v. DenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.