Legal Opinion

Eno v. . Klein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division reversing on the law and the facts the judgment of the trial court and dismissing the complaint is modified by granting a new trial. No motion having been made at the close of the case by the defendant for a dismissal of the complaint or for a direction of a verdict, it constituted in this case a concession or admission upon his part that there was evidence which justified a submission of the case to the jury.

The Appellate Division, therefore, had no power to dismiss the complaint. (Civil Practice Act, sec. 584; Murtha v. Ridley, 232 N. Y. 488.)

Section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murtha v. . RidleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Colella v. Smith-Fredenburg Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Luechinger v. . EichhammerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Sanchez v. DenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API