Legal Opinion

Colella v. Smith-Fredenburg Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J,

Plaintiff has recovered a judgment of $1,745 against defendant for the breach of an implied warranty of fitness for the particular purpose for which defendant knew plaintiff purchased a “ Model 37 B Selden truck,” the purchase being effected by the usual written contract of sale, in which plaintiff directed defendant to enter his order for the truck under its trade name, as above set forth, and which defendant accepted. The contract also contained the following: “ It is mutually agreed that there are no agreements or conditions pertaining to this order not stated herein.”

Subdivisio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bareham & McFarland, Inc. v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Kelvinator Sales Corp. v. Quabbin Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Eno v. . KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Spencer v. HardinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shampine v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Colella v. Smith-Fredenburg Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API