Legal Opinion

Morton v. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The appellants, J. W. Morton and Eva Morton, sued the appellee, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, to recover damages to their, land, covering a period of five years, by reason of the alleged wrongful narrowing or obstruction of a small creek which ran for a short distance on the railroad right of way. It was charged that the water was caused to overflow and cut a channel across their land. They prayed judgment for $2,000, but the jury awarded them only $300, and they appeal.

The ease was pitched upon the ground of negligent maintenance,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Conn.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Neely v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  2. Chicago, St. L. N. O. R. Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API