Legal Opinion

In Re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, Christina Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, Alice P. Broudy v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1987No. 85-2842, 86-5553PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise out of judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 1 in actions for personal injury and wrongful death brought by or on behalf of military and civilian participants in the United States atmospheric nuclear weapons testing program. Appellees are the United States Government and private contractors who participated in the nuclear weapons testing program.

In the district court, the government moved pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2212, to be substituted for the contractors as defendants…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Katusha Nurse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Brannon v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API