Legal Opinion

Cogswell & Wehrle v. Nicholson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1989No. 88CA0342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

Asserting that a valid and binding arbitration agreement had been entered into, the plaintiff, Cogswell & Wehrle, a partnership, appeals the trial court’s order refusing to compel the defendant, R. James Nicholson, to arbitrate disputes between the parties arising from a bank failure. We affirm.

During negotiations concerning the arbitration of the disputes, a written agreement was prepared which provided in pertinent part:

“This agreement to arbitrate will commence from the date that all signatures of the parties hereto are affixed and will remain in full force and effect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Mission Denver Co. v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. APPLEWOOD GARDENS HOMEOWNERS' v. RichterColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fasing v. LaFondColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API