Geaneas v. Willets
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
The plaintiffs in this case own or manage bars providing nude dancing, or work in those establishments as nude dancers or bartenders. They brought suit in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) claiming that a Daytona Beach ordinance, which prohibits exposure of certain body parts in establishments dealing in alcohol, violated their rights under the first and fourteenth amendments. The district court granted partial summary judgment for the defendants and, following a bench trial on the remaining issues, dismissed the plaintiffs’ case. The plaintiffs appeal,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Walter Leroy Moody, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Cafe 207, Inc. v. St. Johns CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- James A. Bonfiglio v. Charles Nugent, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Eriksen & Kupfer, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- 2025 Emery Highway, LLC v. Bibb County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.