Legal Opinion

James A. Bonfiglio v. Charles Nugent, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Eriksen & Kupfer, P.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 1993No. 92-4275PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

This frivolous appeal follows from an equally frivolous lawsuit filed by Appellant James A. Bonfiglio, an attorney with eleven years’ legal experience, who should have known better.

After entering a decree divorcing Bonfiglio and his wife, a state court ordered Bonfiglio to pay directly to the law firm that had represented his ex-wife in the divorce proceedings the sum of $6,385.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for her representation. After a number of months, Bonfiglio filed a motion asking the court to allow him to pay the law firm in installments on the ground that he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ella Tower v. Paralee Moss, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Home Construction Company of Mobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Function Junction, Inc. v. CroweSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Green v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Geaneas v. WilletsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield, in No. 99-3856 v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. In No. 99-3857 Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield, in No. 99-4049 v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb, in No. 99-3858 v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp Inc. Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp Inc. In No. 99-3859 Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb, in No. 99-3898 v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Parker v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Pollice v. National Tax Funding, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Scroggin v. Credit Bureau of Jonesboro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API