Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Heacock

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1908No. Crim. No. 75PublishedCited by 45 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the Sheriff of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Louis Gonsalves, Weldon & Held, Thomas, Pemberton & Thomas, and C. E. McLaughlin, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The petition shows that petitioner is held by the sheriff of Mendocino county by virtue of “a commitment and an order and warrant of commitment made by a justice of the peace of Ten Mile River Township in said county purporting upon its face to hold this petitioner to answer upon the charge of murder. ” It is averred that petitioner “has been committed on said criminal charge without reasonable or probable cause . . . which will more fully appear from a complete transcript of the evidence and the testimony taken at the examination before said justice of the peace as a committing magistrate,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bain v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API