Legal Opinion
In re Mesquita
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1934No. Crim. No. 268PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought in this court seeking the discharge *92of petitioner upon the 'ground that the evidence produced at his preliminary examination did not show reasonable or probable cause that a crime had been committed by him.
The petitioner was held to answer by the committing magistrate for the crime of burglary alleged to have been committed' in the city of San Diego on the sixth day of August, 1933.
Petitioner cites and relies upon numerous authorities which hold that mere possession of stolen property by the accused is not sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte ViceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- In Re LeonardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- In Re CordishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In re McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cleugh v. StrakoschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Curreri v. ViceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.