Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ruffin v. Compass Group USA

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 2002No. COA01-18Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

I do not find competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s finding and conclusion that plaintiff suffered a com-pensable back injury. I disagree with the majority’s application of a “specific traumatic incident” under N.C.G.S. § 97-2(6) to the facts of this case. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

In order to be compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), an injury must result from an “accident arising out of and in the course of the employment.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6) (2001). An accident is an “unlooked for and untoward event which is not expected or designed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Gunter v. Dayco Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API