Legal Opinion

Gulf v. Montier.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1884No. Case No. 1680PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from De Witt. Tried below before the Hon. H. Clay Pleasants.

1Opinion of the Court

West, Associate Justice.—

The first error to which our attention has been invited is the action of the district court in overruling the general demurrer of appellant to the original petition of appellee.

The petition is certainly, in some respects, objectionable. It does not state as distinctly and clearly as should be done the grounds upon which the appellee bases his right to recover in this case. If, on that account, it had been specially excepted to, no doubt the •court would have sustained such special exception and required the appellee to state more specifically, distinctly and clearly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pearson v. FlanaganTexas Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tudor v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HinzieTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gatewood v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Swift v. MulkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Teague v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API