Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Holland v. Miesen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1906No. Nos. 14,862-(209)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of habeas corpus issued from the supreme court upon the relation of Henry Holland, directed to respondent as sheriff of Ramsey county.

1Opinion of the Court

On May 1, 1906, the following opinion was filed:

2Per curiam

The relator was brought before this court by virtue of a writ of habeas corpus. The matter was heard upon the petition and writ and the respondent’s return thereto; it being conceded for the purposes of the hearing that the allegations of fact in the petition are true. A prompt decision necessitates the postponement to a later date of the filing of a formal opinion herein. At this time we simply announce our conclusion, which is that the judgment and commitment by virtue of which the respondentias sheriff, justifies his detention of the-relator,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. In re HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Russell v. IvesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Lee Lim v. Davis, WardenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Eder v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API