Legal Opinion

Carver v. El-Sabawi

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 41267PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*13OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether a ‘ ‘mere happening instruction” and a res ipsa loquitur instruction, given to the jury in a medical malpractice case, were so conflicting that absent additional evidence, the judgment on the jury verdict should be reversed and this case remanded for a new trial. We conclude that they were.

FACTS

Appellant Jerry D. Carver suffered a nerve injury to his left arm and hand sometime during or after an appendectomy. He filed suit against anesthesiologist Rashad El-Sabawi, M.D., the respondent, and surgeon Ronald Rosen, M.D.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kitto v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Jones v. PorrettaMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gunlock v. New Frontier Hotel Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Driscoll v. ErreguibleNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Miller v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hallmark v. EldridgeNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cook v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Smith v. KoslowSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Tri-County Equipment & Leasing, LLC v. KlinkeNevada Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API