Legal Opinion
Van Osdol v. Vogt
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 16, 1996No. 94SC646PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
Petitioner Holley E. Van Osdol challenges the dismissal of her retaliation claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000e-3 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), and certain of her intentional tort claims against the respondents Hugh Frederick Vogt, Mile Hi Church of Religious Science, and the United Churches of Religious Science. The trial court found that the claims were precluded by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and dismissed them under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and (5). The court of appeals upheld the dismissal of the claims. We affirm and remand with directions.
I
Hugh Frederick Vogt was a past…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Monica L. McDowell Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church Will AcklesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Malicki v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Malyon v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sandor Demkovich v. St. Andrew the Apostle ParishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Malyon v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.