United States v. McFarland
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
This is one of many suits which have been brought by the United States, hereinafter called the government, to recover from dealers in wool profits which the plaintiff says the defendants, during the year 1918, made in excess of the maximum permitted by the “regulations” promulgated by the Wool Division of the War Industries Board for the handling of the wool clip of that year. Among the reported eases dealing with some of the questions raised are United States v. Powers (D. C.) 274 E. 131; United States v. Smith (D. C.) 285 E. 751; United States v. Gordin (D. C.) 287 F.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- United States v. McIntoshDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1932
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Kidd v. Hilton of San Juan, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
- Alpirn v. HuffmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.