Legal Opinion
Alpirn v. Huffman
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided April 2, 1943No. 435 CivilPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE and DELEHANT, District Judges.
After due notice and hearing, the court has denied the prayer of the plaintiffs for the allowance of a preliminary injunction in this case. The implications of this action, beyond its significance to the parties litigant, prompt some reference to the incident that has evoked the litigation, and a summary statement of the reasons that have governed the instant decision.
The plaintiffs, father and son, operate, under the partnership style of A. B. Alpirn Company, in the city of Omaha, a scrap metal business, which has been in existence for fifty-one years-.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- In Re Spier Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Ken-Rad Tube & Lamp Corp., Owensboro, Ky. v. BadeauDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
- In Re Inland Waterways, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- United States v. 3.65 Acres of Land in City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.