Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Paul Revere Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 23, 1998No. Civil 98-1140 (SMO)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion by Mark R. Rosen, Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff Judith Weinstein, for an order remanding this action to New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division, Burlington County. Defendant Paul Revere Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”) opposes this motion. After eareful review of the parties’ submissions and for the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the plaintiffs motion to remand.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action arises from an insurance coverage dispute. The plaintiff was employed by Radiology…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Farm Indemnity v. FornaroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Stone v. Disability Management Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Colarusso v. Transcapital Fiscal Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Harding v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- McCann v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.