Wissner v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
The petitioner, defendant in a pending City Court criminal prosecution for shoplifting, seeks relief by way of special action from a denial of his motion to have his mental condition examined pursuant to Rule 11, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. The magistrate recognized the petitioner’s right to have the issue of his competency to stand trial determined, but concluded that City Court lacked jurisdiction to conduct such inquiry and therefore petitioner’s sole remedy was to petition Superior Court concerning his mental condition.
Rule 11.1, Rules of Criminal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- State v. Pima County Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Roubos v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.