Legal Opinion

Berkholz v. Benepe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1922No. 22,972PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $3,500 against defendant, a physician and surgeon, for malpractice. A motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial was made. The court denied the motion for judgment, but granted a new trial unless plaintiff consented to a reduction of the verdict to $1,800. Plaintiff filed his consent, and defendant appeals.

On December 1, 1920, plaintiff, while in the employ of Griggs, Cooper & Company, St. Paul, fractured both bones of his right leg a few inches above the ankle. He was taken to1 a hospital, and de-. fendant was called by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Getchell v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Evans v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Manion v. TweedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API