Legal Opinion

McDonogh v. DeGruys

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, AugusUn, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSpoffobd, J.

Allou d'Héméeourt, styling himself warrantor and appellee, has moved to dismiss this appeal, because the transcript was not filed within three judicial days after the return day.

The appellant, admitting the fact, urges various reasons why the motion should not prevail.

He says that d?üémécourt is without interest in the case, being no party to the record, and therefore his motion cannot be heard. It is a sufficient answer to this objection to say that the plaintiff has treated him as a party appellee, by giving an appeal bond in his favor.

It is alleged that the defendants have waived their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duperron v. Van WickleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. New Iberia Nat. Bank v. LyonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Mix v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. LeBlanc v. LemaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API