Legal Opinion

Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1934No. 4740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Defendants appealed suspensively from a judgment rendered against them. September 1, 1933, was the return day for the appeal. The record was received by the clerk of this court several days prior to the return day, but was not filed by him because the advance deposit of $5, authorized by law and required by our rule No. 3, had not been paid. This deposit was made by defendants’ attorneys on September 7th and the record then duly filed. Plaintiff, on March 7, 1934, filed motion to dismiss the appeal because of the tardy filing of the record here, alleging, as is true, that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stockbridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Gagneaux v. DesonierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Hudson v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Thibodeaux v. CayardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  5. McDonogh v. DeGruysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Favrot v. FavrotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Twin City Motor Co. v. PettitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Riggs v. F. Strauss SonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Loe v. WhitmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API