Legal Opinion
Duperron v. Van Wickle
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1843PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Pointe Coupée, Nicholls, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The dismissal of this appeal is asked, on the ground that the transcript was not filed on the return day. The counsel for the appellant urges, that the application is too tardy, as it was not made until after the transcript had been actually filed; and he has referred us to the following authorities. 10 La. 502. Ib. 506. 15 La. 15. 17 La. 113. The appellee relies on 12 La. 535. 8 La. 206. 7 La. 176. 4 La. 67. 3 La. 251. 8 Mart. N. S. 184. In the case of Desarmes’ Heirs v. Desormes, Syndic, 17 La. 115, we held that the cases in which the appeals were dismissed, although the transcript was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pond v. HortonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Désormes' Heirs v. Désormes' CuratorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- Bell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
- Chandler v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
- Kirkman v. ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olivera v. The Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Haas v. BuckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- McDonogh v. DeGruysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Connell v. David Bernhardt Paint Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Tilly v. WoodhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.