State v. Hoehne
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
In this criminal case, defendant was charged with possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing defendant’s self-incriminating statements to a police officer. Because we agree with the state that the trial court’s rationale for suppression was erroneous, we reverse and remand.
The following facts were either expressly or implicitly found by the trial court in summary written findings. In January 1998, defendant was on supervised probation in Curry County for criminal trespass and menacing. In early January, defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- In re SchwindtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Matter of Internal Operating RulesMontana Supreme Court · 2010