Williamson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
These are two actions of tort for personal injuries. The city of Boston and the Boston Elevated Bail-way Company are the defendants.
The plaintiff, a passenger in one of the cars of the railway company, in alighting from the car between five thirty and six o’clock on the evening of October 2, 1923, stepped into a hole or depression in the street and was injured. The street, it was agreed, "was an accepted street of the city of *231Boston.” Statutory notice was given the city. The depression was about two feet from the car track; it was from six to twelve inches deep and had existed for some time…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marvin v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Babson v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Block v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Wakeley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Farrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. Town of AmesburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Whalen v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Coyne v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951