Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 6, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

These are two actions of tort for personal injuries. The city of Boston and the Boston Elevated Bail-way Company are the defendants.

The plaintiff, a passenger in one of the cars of the railway company, in alighting from the car between five thirty and six o’clock on the evening of October 2, 1923, stepped into a hole or depression in the street and was injured. The street, it was agreed, "was an accepted street of the city of *231Boston.” Statutory notice was given the city. The depression was about two feet from the car track; it was from six to twelve inches deep and had existed for some time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marvin v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Babson v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Block v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Wakeley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Farrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Town of AmesburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Whalen v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Coyne v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API