Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Park Bank v. Roger E. Westburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2013No. 2010AP003158Published

1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 70. (concurring). I write separately to point out two fundamental principles: (1) the rights and obligations of guarantors are established by the guaranty contract, under which the guarantor and the creditor for whose benefit the guaranty was given operate; and (2) the majority opinion affirms that only a shareholder or beneficial owner has standing to bring a derivative claim under Wisconsin corporate law.1

¶ 71. I agree with the majority opinion that all counterclaims and affirmative defenses raised herein, except one, are derivative and therefore, they cannot be brought in this action.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Bank of Sun Prairie v. OpsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API