Park Bank v. Roger E. Westburg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 70. (concurring). I write separately to point out two fundamental principles: (1) the rights and obligations of guarantors are established by the guaranty contract, under which the guarantor and the creditor for whose benefit the guaranty was given operate; and (2) the majority opinion affirms that only a shareholder or beneficial owner has standing to bring a derivative claim under Wisconsin corporate law.1
¶ 71. I agree with the majority opinion that all counterclaims and affirmative defenses raised herein, except one, are derivative and therefore, they cannot be brought in this action.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bank of Sun Prairie v. OpsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.