Legal Opinion

Wippert v. BLACKFEET TRIBE, ETC.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1982No. 82-022PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

The Wipperts appeal a Glacier County District Court judgment that the Blackfeet Tribe is entitled to enforce a tribal court judgment as a matter of comity, and that the Robertsons are entitled to recover certain cattle pasturage fees from the Wipperts. The Wipperts contend that the Tribe cannot enforce its tribal court judgment by filing a notice of that judgment as a lien in the District Court, and that it cannot be tacitly implied that the Wipperts, as assignors of the right to recover the pasturage fees, guaranteed that their assignee would pay those fees. We agree, and hold that a tribal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Wakefield v. Little LightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Begay v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Patrons State Bank & Trust Co. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. In Re the Marriage of LimpyMontana Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mexican v. Circle BearSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Support Obligation of Day v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Agri West v. Koyama Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API