Legal Opinion
Blumenthal v. Drudge
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 22, 1999No. Civ.A. No. 97-1968(PLF)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it ripe motions to compel discovery from both parties. Defendant first filed a motion to compel plaintiffs to respond fully to three categories of defense discovery requests: (1) all of defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production of documents to which plaintiffs objected out of time, (2) defendant’s request for plaintiff Sidney Blumenthal’s notes of his conversations with David Brock and several other journalists, and (3) a number of questions that Mr. Blumenthal refused to answer at his deposition on grounds of executive…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Wolston v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re: Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Nesse v. PittmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.