Runewicz v. Keystone Insurance Co.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below is reversed.

*357Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

In Support of Per Curiam Order To Reverse :

Although. I do not consider the award in this case to be “unconscionable”1 as that term is ordinarily employed, I do consider it to be so plainly contrary to the language of the insurance contract as to constitute a manifest disregard for the law. As Professor Corbin stated: “An award can be set aside for fraud or collusion, or for "manifest disregard’ of law.”2 In the instant case the insurance contract defines an uninsured automobile to include “an automobile . . .…