Legal Opinion

Hain v. Keystone Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 528PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The issue presented on appeal is whether the court below erred in entering an order pursuant to an award of arbitrators in a case involving uninsured motorist coverage.

Appellee, Betty Hain, was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by appellant, Keystone In surance Company, which, provided, inter alia, $10,000 of uninsured motorist coverage. On September 27,1970, appellee was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist while a passenger in her own automobile. As a result of this accident, appellee sustained serious personal injuries. On the date of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. F.J. Busse Co. v. Sheila Zipporah, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Gallagher v. Educator & Executive Insurers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Reinhart v. State Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Shapiro v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API