Legal Opinion
Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2008No. 06-3578PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Trafalgar Corporation sought a federal court determination of its constitutional takings and equal protection claims against the Miami County Board of Commissioners and Concord Township. The district court dismissed the case on a motion for summary judgment finding that Trafalgar’s claims were barred by principles of preclusion. For the following reasons we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.
I
Trafalgar owns a fifty-acre tract of land located in Concord Township, Ohio. The property is zoned A-2 Agricultural, which would allow residential…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Hensley v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- AGRIPOST, LLC v. Miami-Dade County, Fla.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- UPS Ground Freight, Inc. v. FarranDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.