Lodge v. Stone

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The questions involved in this case were purely of fact. They were submitted to the jury in a charge to which no exception was taken and no error assigned. This court cannot set aside a verdict, which is supported by evidence, merely because, judged by the record, it is against the preponderance of the evidence: Saxman v. McCormick, 278 Pa. 268, 274.

The principal question at issue was whether the plaintiff had been employed to do certain work by the defendant personally or by him as the representative of a foreign corporation of which he was president and the majority…