Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cohen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1931No. Appeal 199, 200 and 201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Appellant was convicted before a magistrate of the City of Philadelphia, under Section 3 of the Act of May 11, 1911, P. L. 275, as amended by the Act of July 11, 1923, P. L. 992, of having, upon three occa sions, given “false or insufficient weight” in retail sales of anthracite coal. An appeal was allowed by the quarter sessions; after a trial, de novo, before Heeligmah, J., appellant was adjudged guilty in each case and sentenced to pay the fine provided for a first offense. From these sentences we have three separate appeals; as the questions involved are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CrowlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Lodge v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. WiswesserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Pittsburgh v. RuffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. HurtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API