Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1975No. 36170PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

This appeal is taken from an order of the circuit court denying movant’s motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 27.26. The 27.26 motion alleged two grounds which are asserted on appeal: 1) that movant was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his attorney persuaded him to waive his right of appeal without advising him of the consequences; and 2) that the conviction was based on prejudicial hearsay testimony. After reviewing the record and considering the issues raised, we affirm the order of the circuit court denying the motion to vacate.

Movant was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. HurttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Floyd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Plant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Lane v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Noble v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API