Lake to Lake Dairy Co-Operative v. Andrews
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The following three issues are raised on this appeal:
1. Did the trial court err in holding Paradise to be negligent as to lookout as a matter of law ?
2. Did the court err in including in the special verdict the right-of-way question with respect to the alleged negligence of Paradise ?
*1733. Was Cenefelt guilty of negligence as to speed as a matter of law ?
Paradise testified that as he approached the intersection and when about 30 to 40 feet distant from it, he looked to his left and then looked to his right when he was “right up by the intersection” and “just about to enter the intersection.” He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reuhl v. UszlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Rock v. SarazenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Paluczak v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Schoenberg v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Sawdey v. SchwenkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Lind v. LundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Schweidler v. CarusoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Grutzner v. KruseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.