Legal Opinion

CITY OF GUYTON v. BARROW (Two Cases)

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 20, 2019No. S18G0944, S18G0945Published

1Opinion of the Court

305 Ga. 799

FINAL COPY S18G0944. CITY OF GUYTON v. BARROW. S18G0945. DUNN v. BARROW. PETERSON, Justice. At the core of the judicial power is the authority and responsibility to interpret legal text. We have many tools that aid us in this task. When we find the text of a statute ambiguous, nearly a century of Georgia case law instructs us to defer to the interpretation of the state agency charged with administering the statute. More recently, we decided that agency interpretations of their own regulations should be afforded the same deference. Some have argued that this doctrine is in tension…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API