Legal Opinion

Cook v. Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the third district and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Motee, J.:

This action was brought in the third district court to recover damages arising from the alleged negligence of the defendant in constructing, maintaining, and leaving the rails of its track projecting above the surface of the public sidewalk and line of public travel on West Third street, in the city of Salt Lake, so that plaintiff, while walking along the said sidewalk on the evening of September 22, 1889, stumbled against the rails of such track, and broke her right arm and was otherwise injured. On the hearing of the case the respondent’s counsel contended that this court had no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Craig v. SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Biagi v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Reed v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Voorhees v. Manti CityUtah Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API