Legal Opinion

Hebinger v. Ross

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by Frederick Hebinger against John C. Ross and another for goods sold and delivered and on a special contract. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff for less than the amount claimed. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

(after stating the facts). 1. Was this suit begun to recover upon a mutual and open account current? It does not appear that plaintiff opened or kept an account with defendants. The case made for plaintiff, at the trial, tended to prove the making of the written contract heretofore referred to; that, pursuant thereto, on various days, the first one January 27th and the last one March 16th, he loaded and sent to defendants a total of 74 car loads of logs, containing 3,375 pieces, scaling 179,130 feet, worth, at $7.50 per thousand, $1,343.47; that defendants ought to have credit for $900 paid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walsh v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Campbell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Sperry v. Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hertzberg & Noveck v. Ira J. SpoonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Curry v. RaichMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API