In Re the Welfare of Hall
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
This case presents the issue of whether and under what conditions appointed counsel in a child deprivation proceeding may withdraw from a frivolous appeal. We hold that, absent the client's consent, such withdrawal is never permitted and deny counsel's motion to withdraw in the present case. We also raise and consider two sub stantive issues sua sponte and, while not finding them frivolous, conclude there was no error in the present case.
The State instituted this action pursuant to RCW 13.34-.180 to terminate the parent-child relationship of appellant, Clayton Hall, and his wife, Debra Hall,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re the Welfare of AschauerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. A.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Department of Social & Health Services v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.