Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Department of Social & Health Services

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2011No. 83516-1PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 The legislature has provided that before a trial court terminates a parent-child relationship, the *572court must find, among other things, that the child has been found to be a dependent child. In this case, the order finding the child K.N.J. dependent as to her father, petitioner Michael Jenkins, was void because the order was entered by a pro tempore judge without Jenkins’ consent. Nonetheless, we hold that K.N.J.’s dependency was amply proved at the termination trial, where Jenkins was present and represented by counsel, and supported by findings of fact made by a constitutionally valid…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re Dependency of KNJWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re the Welfare of S.J.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Gladin v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. J.B. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2017

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API